NOTE: This Discussion is closed.
TOPIC: Reflections on Personal Impacts, Emerging Issues
Discussion List > Focus Point: What will make the Prioritization Guidance Acceptable?
FOCUS POINT: What will make the Prioritization Guidance Acceptable?
How can we ensure that this Prioritization Guidance will work satisfactorily in communities all around this country?
Desired outcome:
Understanding of the degree of general acceptance of the Prioritization Guidance and the challenges to its implementation.
VIEW: Outline Full Text COMMENT ORDER: Newest First Oldest First
Submitted by Deborah Robinson on 12/6/07 07:05 AM
-
-
change the policy when production capability has changed
Submitted by larry wright on 12/6/07 10:37 AM
-
-
-
-
-
-
And I don't know why your town did not participate in whatever program was available to them.
Submitted by Roy Kamen on 12/6/07 12:40 PM
-
CT towns have not been allowed to participate in antiviral purchases
Submitted by Katharine Fisher on 12/6/07 02:27 PM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
My recommendations to my friends, colleagues and family are
Submitted by larry wright on 12/6/07 11:05 AM
-
-
-
-
-
-
Can we consider what would make the Guidance ACCEPTABLE, rather than what would make it better?
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/6/07 07:58 AM
-
-
-
regardless of how many die from the next influenza pandemic
Submitted by larry wright on 12/6/07 11:09 AM
-
-
-
How will the public accespt and respect this guidance?
Submitted by Caroline Bridgers on 12/6/07 05:16 PM
-
-
-
-
So, to make the prioritization ACCEPTABLE we'd need additional guidance for more severe panflu?
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/6/07 11:27 AM
-
YES - To make the prioritization ACCEPTABLE we'd need additional guidance for more severe panflu
Submitted by Roy Kamen on 12/6/07 12:47 PM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
how about all the support materials for administering vax?
Submitted by Roy Kamen on 12/6/07 10:34 AM
-
-
-
-
What do you think of the "Values" that underpin the Prioritization Guidance?
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/6/07 09:06 AM
-
-
-
-
HCWs need to be allowed to stay home with their kids
Submitted by Catherine Jackie Mitchell on 12/6/07 10:05 AM
-
-
-
-
If I were to develop a guidance framework
Submitted by Catherine Jackie Mitchell on 12/6/07 09:50 AM
-
Some of these "Values" questions are addressed in the Poll. Have you completed the Poll yet?
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/6/07 12:10 PM
-
-
Thanks for completing the poll. Sorry if it felt "Boxed in"
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/6/07 04:42 PM
-
-
-
-
-
The issue of the US government telling the truth to its citizens
Submitted by Martha London on 12/6/07 09:39 AM
-
I disagree that national security is any less important in a pandemic.
Submitted by Rebecca Smith on 12/6/07 10:45 AM
-
Submitted by larry wright on 12/6/07 10:49 AM
-
So the Guidance would be more acceptable if framed as a prioritization tool with flexibility?
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/6/07 12:19 PM
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/6/07 12:16 PM
-
Provide examples of changes...we can anticipate many of them
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/6/07 12:20 PM
-
Why are we allocating vaccines based on population...a better way
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/6/07 12:21 PM
-
-
I concure...but there is a problem with how they are allocated
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/6/07 01:08 PM
-
-
-
What ethical framework will be used to make changes during a pandemic?
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/6/07 12:22 PM
-
What is going to prompt a re-assessment of the guidance?
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/6/07 12:22 PM
Submitted by eric kelley on 12/6/07 12:46 PM
-
Education and credible distribution plan will be key.
Submitted by Joan Pfinsgraff on 12/6/07 02:23 PM
Submitted by
Nicholas Dewar
on 12/6/07 05:07 PM