NOTE: This Discussion is closed.
DISCUSSION: Prioritization in the Critical Infrastructure (CI) Group
COMMENT: Interesting comment....
Submitted by Terry Adirim
on 12/5/07 8:42 AM
I don't think it's clear that 40% of "critical" workers will be out.
And not only that, the 40% figure is supposed to be the guess at the entire workforce and at the peak of a pandemic. The day to day absentee rate may be significantly lower.
With regard to military personnel, I would think that the National Guard (who are prioritized in Tier 2) would serve the role you described. That would be a State and local issue as the National Guard is a State asset. Good point.
COMMENT THREAD
VIEW: Outline Full Text COMMENT ORDER: Newest First Oldest First
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/5/07 06:41 AM
-
-
Many supermarkets, other places to get food - Redundancy?
Submitted by Roy Kamen on 12/5/07 07:39 AM
-
-
-
-
-
Lessons from History - Polio and Questions for anyone who can answer them
Submitted by Diana Tolladay on 12/5/07 03:38 PM
-
Find the questions that relate to the Guidance Prioritization!
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/5/07 03:49 PM
-
-
-
-
-
-
Towns were told they are not allowed to buy antivirals
Submitted by Katharine Fisher on 12/6/07 06:20 AM
-
-
-
-
-
Recategorize Haz-Mat Transporters as Water Treatment Personnel
Submitted by Rebecca Smith on 12/5/07 12:58 PM
-
-
-
-
-
Interesting comment....
Submitted by Terry Adirim
on 12/5/07 08:42 AM
-
Worker Absenteeism is the most important planning issue
Submitted by Justin Kamen on 12/5/07 10:52 AM
-
-
-
Very good point...is the guidence clear for them though?
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/5/07 12:22 PM
-