NOTE: This Discussion is closed.
DISCUSSION: Prioritization in the Homeland and National Security (HNS) Group
Discussion List > Discussion: Prioritization in the Homeland and National Security (HNS) Group > Comment
COMMENT: Are we really prioritizing no one?
Submitted by David A. Sherman on 12/5/07 7:57 PM
This entire discussion regarding 1st-tier status for teachers only emphasizes the dilemma of vaccine allocation, and the need for a process like this to develop a clear policy. It really does take a village to raise a child, and only the people in that village who are healthy enough can help do so. But at a certain tipping point (as with the question of early vaccination for families of high-risk workers), we start to talk about prioritizing everybody. We could take this even further: parents are also necessary in childrearing, and thus a part of maintenance of social order (Note that Secretary Leavitt has said that priority for treatment in a pandemic should go to those who keep society going; this would have to include parents). Unfortunately, with limited vaccine supplies, prioritizing so many means prioritizing practically no one. (Full disclosure: I'm a direct caregiver, and parent of a teen and a 10-year-old)
COMMENT THREAD
VIEW: Outline Full Text COMMENT ORDER: Newest First Oldest First
-
-
priority for the family members of all those labeled Critical to our society?
Submitted by Roy Kamen on 12/5/07 07:32 AM
-
Need to Clarify This to Local Emergency Management Organizations
Submitted by Cathy Pinette on 12/5/07 07:43 AM
-
-
-
-
-
Are we really prioritizing no one?
Submitted by David A. Sherman on 12/5/07 07:57 PM
-
-
-
-
-
Does anyone here know how much of the grid is automated?
Submitted by David A. Sherman on 12/5/07 08:00 PM
-
-
-
-
-
Categorization within Tiers: Which subsets come earlier?
Submitted by Brant Goode
on 12/5/07 08:16 AM