NOTE: This Discussion is closed.
DISCUSSION: Prioritization in the Critical Infrastructure (CI) Group
COMMENT: Extra Burden on Cities and Towns
Submitted by Catherine Jackie Mitchell on 12/6/07 5:05 AM
Cities and towns in rural areas should not have to bear the extra burden that you are suggesting. Each city and town must be "on their own".
If a city or town volunteers their services then that is a wonderful thing. While being resilient ourselves we must also look to our neighbors needs and assist when possible.
COMMENT THREAD
VIEW: Outline Full Text COMMENT ORDER: Newest First Oldest First
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/5/07 06:41 AM
-
-
Many supermarkets, other places to get food - Redundancy?
Submitted by Roy Kamen on 12/5/07 07:39 AM
-
-
-
-
-
Lessons from History - Polio and Questions for anyone who can answer them
Submitted by Diana Tolladay on 12/5/07 03:38 PM
-
Find the questions that relate to the Guidance Prioritization!
Submitted by Nicholas Dewar
on 12/5/07 03:49 PM
-
-
-
-
-
-
Towns were told they are not allowed to buy antivirals
Submitted by Katharine Fisher on 12/6/07 06:20 AM
-
-
-
-
-
Recategorize Haz-Mat Transporters as Water Treatment Personnel
Submitted by Rebecca Smith on 12/5/07 12:58 PM
-
-
Extra Burden on Cities and Towns
Submitted by Catherine Jackie Mitchell on 12/6/07 05:05 AM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Worker Absenteeism is the most important planning issue
Submitted by Justin Kamen on 12/5/07 10:52 AM
-
-
-
Very good point...is the guidence clear for them though?
Submitted by Nick Kelley on 12/5/07 12:22 PM
-